Wikitech-l June 2010

81 participants
58 discussions

Database dumps
by Byrial Jensen 17 Apr '25

17 Apr '25

Until some weeks ago http://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html used to show 4 dumps in progress at the same time. That meant that new database dumps normally was available within about 3 weeks for all databases except for enwiki and maybe dewiki where the dump process due to size took longer time. However the 4 dumps processes at one time become 3 some weeks ago. And after massive failures at June 4, only one dump has been in progress at the same time. So at the current speed it will take several months to come thru all dumps. Is it possible to speed up the process again using several dump processes at the same time? Thank you, Byrial

3 2

User-Agent:
by Domas Mituzas 17 Apr '25

17 Apr '25

Hi! from now on specific per-bot/per-software/per-client User-Agent header is mandatory for contacting Wikimedia sites. Domas

19 61

EBNF grammar project status?
by Steve Bennett 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

What's the status of the project to create a grammar for Wikitext in EBNF? There are two pages: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitext_Metasyntax http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Markup_spec Nothing seems to have happened since January this year. Also the comments on the latter page seem to indicate a lack of clear goal: is this just a fun project, is it to improve the existing parser, or is it to facilititate a new parser? It's obviously a lot of work, so it needs to be of clear benefit. Brion requested the grammar IIRC (and there's a comment to that effect at http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7 ), so I'm wondering what became of it. Is there still a goal of replacing the parser? Or is there some alternative plan? Steve

26 217

MediaWiki to Latex Converter
by Hugo Vincent 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

Hi everyone, I recently set up a MediaWiki (http://server.bluewatersys.com/w90n740/) and I need to extra the content from it and convert it into LaTeX syntax for printed documentation. I have googled for a suitable OSS solution but nothing was apparent. I would prefer a script written in Python, but any recommendations would be very welcome. Do you know of anything suitable? Kind Regards, Hugo Vincent, Bluewater Systems.

6 13

Backups
by Eugene 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi everyone, Are there any updates regarding Wikipedia's backup systems? I've created a bug to track this at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18255. Cheers, Eugene

4 5

serious questions about UsabilityInitiative going live
by Glanthor 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hi! I've read on the techblog that the new UI go live in April. I have some questions: 1) What version? Acai, babaco, citron? 2) How/where could a wiki customize the special character insert menu, and the inserted strings? And the embed file (picture) button inserts this: "[[Example.jpg]]", without any "File:" or "Image:"! 3) The search and replace button is available in firefox, but does not appear at all in opera. Why? 4) Currently the new navigable TOC does not work on FF/Opera at all (I've tried those). Not too early for live deployment? Regards, Akos Szabo (Glanthor Reviol)

21 45

implementing the Interlanguage extension
by Amir E. Aharoni 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

Sorry about bugging the list about it, but can anyone please explain the reason for not enabling the Interlanguage extension? See bug 15607 - https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15607 I believe that enabling it will be very beneficial for many projects and many people expressed their support of it. I am not saying that there are no reasons to not enable it; maybe there is a good reason, but i don't understand it. I also understand that there are many other unsolved bugs, but this one seems to have a ready and rather simple solution. I am only sending it to raise the problem. If you know the answer, you may comment at the bug page. Thanks in advance. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni heb: http://haharoni.wordpress.com | eng: http://aharoni.wordpress.com cat: http://aprenent.wordpress.com | rus: http://amire80.livejournal.com "We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace." - T. Moore

6 8

LaTeX algorithmic package support for pretty algorithm pseudo-code?
by Adrien Guillon 02 Jul '10

02 Jul '10

Hello all, I would really really love to have the ability to use the algorithmic package inside MediaWiki software. I am writing up the details of a bunch of algorithms, and so far I have found it extremely painful to do. If there is a better way to make my algorithms look beautiful, I'd love to hear it. For your convenience, here is a link that shows some nice output of the algorithmic package: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Algorithms_and_Pseudocode What needs to be done to add support for this? Is this something that can be done, or does it conflict with some design principle behind the current solution? Thanks! AJ

4 8

Self-determination of language versions in questions of skin?
by Martin Maurer 01 Jul '10

01 Jul '10

Hello, I'm a member of the German language Wikipedia community and have a question that no-one could give me a definite answer to so far. I hope someone here can answer it, or point me to where I should go to get a definite answer. The question is, what level of self-determination do the 260 language versions of Wikipedia have as to the design of their user interfaces (skins)? Can individual wikis choose independently modifications of their skins, and which of the available skins to use as the default for unregistered users, or is this controlled centrally by the Foundation? For backgrund, this question arose after the German language Wikipedia (de.wikipedia.org) was switched from Monobook to Vector as the default skin on the 10th of June 2010, resulting in considerable criticism from the community. On the more sober side of the debate, it was asked whether it would be theoretically possible to return to Monobook as the default skin, at least for some time until the biggest known issues with Vector have been fixed. Under the theoretical scenario that a majority voted for a return to Monobook as the default skin, would it be possible at all to switch it back? Or would the Foundation not permit that? The question seems to be a very fundamental one and I would also appreciate insights into the big picture. How independent are the language versions? To what degree can they govern themselves and to what degree are they bound by decisions made centrally by the Foundation? Thanks, Martin

9 9

How to to replace output of SpecialPage (for use as SPARQL endpont)?
by Samuel Lampa 29 Jun '10

29 Jun '10

Is it possible (and if so, how to) totally replace the output from a Special page (including the sending headers etc)? That is, can I use a SpecialPage as a SPARQL Endpoint and have it output pure RDF/XML (or similar) if a SPARQL query is sent to it via POST, while if not, it should just display the SpecialPage including a form for submitting a SPARQL query. Samuel -- Samuel Lampa --------------------------------------- Biotech Student @ Uppsala University GSoC Student @ Semantic MediaWiki --------------------------------------- E-mail: samuel.lampa[at]gmail.com Mobile: +46 (0)70-2073732 Blog: http://saml.rilspace.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/samuellampa ---------------------------------------

2 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Wikitech-l June 2010